Nickel
Doublet Separations
- Ni 2p: 17.3 eV
- Ni 3p: 1.8 eV
The Energies Listed are Binding Energies!
- Ni 2s: 1008 eV
- Ni 2p: 852 eV
- Ni 3s: 112 eV
- Ni 3p: 68 eV
The Energies Listed are Binding Energies!
Ni is primarily analysed via the 2p orbital
- F KLL (Al source) (844 eV) – Significant overlap
- Fe LMM (Al source) (837 eV) – Low level overlap
- Po 4p (851 eV)
- Mn LMM (Al source) (853 eV)
- La 3d (852 eV) + La MNN (Al source) (870 eV)
- I 3p (875 eV)
- Ra 4p (879 eV
Energies listed are Kinetic Energies!
Ni LMM: ~ 844 eV
The Energies Listed are Binding Energies!
| Compound | Ni 2p 3/2 / eV | Auger parameter (α‘) / eV |
| Ni | 852.54 | 1698.76 |
| NiO | 853.78 | 1697.71 |
| Ni(OH)2 | 855.80 | 1698.38 |
| γ-NiOOH | 855.75 | 1700.04 |
| NiF2 | 858.12 | 1697.86 |
| NiCl2 | 856.77 | 1698.65 |
| NiBr2 | 855.27 | 1698.52 |
| NiI2 | 854.46 | 1699.69 |
Table 1: Auger parameters of nickel compounds(4)
Nickel metal is not particularly unusual, it consists of the prominent asymmetric 2p emission, a small satellite peak at +6 eV, which following REELS analysis has been attributed to a surface plasmon loss feature rather than a shake-up peak, a feature at +9.5 eV, attributed to a bulk plasmon loss feature and a significant spin-orbit separation of 17.3 eV (Figure 2).(2) Care should be taken when peak fitting since, as is the case with most first row transition metals, the FWHM of the 2p 1/2 is larger than that of the 3/2 (~ x1.667) due the peak broadening caused by a Coster-Kronig transition.(3)
NiO has a complicated spectra (Figure 3), however, which can not be represented by a purely Ni2+ envelope (Figure 4). The three major peaks shift in energy and width, while a large broad peak at 861 eV appears, likely arising from the combined losses at +4.3 eV, +6.0 and +7.4 eV due to intra-and inter-band transitions allowed by breakdown of dipole selection rules in polycrystalline samples with delocalized electrons.(2) The peaks at the high energy end are shake-up satellites from ligand-metal charge transfer. It is thought that the reason that NiO cannot be fit using a free ion envelope (whereas Ni(OH)2 and NiOOH can both be fit using the free ion envelopes of Ni2+ and Ni3+, again with an additional broad peak due to other intrinsic losses) may be due to a short Ni-O bond length in the rock salt Fm-3m structure with a high degree of orbital overlap leading to dominant inter-atomic angular momentum interactions with nearest neighbouring NiO6 clusters and charge transfer from the O 2p band.(4)
As a general rule it is known that Ni(III) species exist at higher energies than than of Ni(II) species,(6) and this can be seen from the Gupta and Sen multiplet(5) envelopes in Figure 4, where the contribution at lower energy is diminished for Ni(III) free ions. This facilitates a qualitative analysis of Ni 2p regions for the most part which is frequently misinterpreted as a quantitative assessment (using simplistic or even singular GL or Voigt functions) in literature. Quantitative assessment requires an appreciation of the multiplet splitting envelopes as a minimum and deconvolution is entirely possible with some knowledge of the system, using some of the methods derived by Biesinger et al.(7) In the case of unknown mixtures, it may be useful to use spectral subtraction or difference spectra to identify mixed phases. These methods have even extended to mixed oxide systems such as nickel chromates.(8)
Nickel, as with most first row TMs, is not straightforward to analyse by XPS. The 2p region is the most commonly analysed, however it undergoes extensive multiplet splitting upon the formation of a compound (Figure 1), rendering chemical state analysis a daunting task. The only realistic photoemission which may overlap with Ni 2p is the La 3d peak, although the extent of overlap is minimal. Auger structure from Fe LMM, Ce LMM and F KLL have been known to cause issues (can be severe depending on relative amounts of Ni:X, X = Fe, Ce, F) with Ni 2p deconvolution when using Al (1486.7 eV) X-rays.
Auger parameters may be useful in the analysis of nickel chemical state (with the exception of metallic alloys). Mark Biesinger has extensively studied and modeled nickel compounds(4) and determined there is a significant effect to the Ni L3M45M45 auger upon changing the ligand caused primarily by changes to electronegativity (initial state effects). The auger parameters determined by Biesinger et al may be of use in Ni XPS analysis (Table 1).
| Compound | Ni 2p 3/2 / eV | Auger parameter (α‘) / eV |
| Ni | 852.54 | 1698.76 |
| NiO | 853.78 | 1697.71 |
| Ni(OH)2 | 855.80 | 1698.38 |
| γ-NiOOH | 855.75 | 1700.04 |
| NiF2 | 858.12 | 1697.86 |
| NiCl2 | 856.77 | 1698.65 |
| NiBr2 | 855.27 | 1698.52 |
| NiI2 | 854.46 | 1699.69 |
In recent years, non-linear least squared fits have been utilized to approach the deconvolution and quantification of unknown samples, however this approach relies heavily on obtaining good quality standard reference spectra, as well as the assumption that the unknown spectra is free from additional charge-transfer, relaxation or other inter-atomic effects.(9)
Not available
Not available
- Spectra recorded by HarwellXPS
- Grosvenor, A. P., et al. (2006). “New interpretations of XPS spectra of nickel metal and oxides.” Surface science 600(9): 1771-1779. Read it online here.
- Konishi, T., et al. (1999). “Chemical shift and lineshape of high‐resolution Ni Kα x‐ray fluorescence spectra.” X‐Ray Spectrometry: An International Journal 28(6): 470-477. Read it online here.
- Grosvenor, A. P., et al. (2016). Biesinger, M. C., et al. (2012). “The role of the Auger parameter in XPS studies of nickel metal, halides and oxides.” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 14(7): 2434-2442. Read it online here.
- Gupta, R. and S. Sen (1975). “Calculation of multiplet structure of core p-vacancy levels. II.” Physical Review B 12(1): 15. Read it online here.
- Carley, A., et al. (1999). “The formation and characterisation of Ni3+—an X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic investigation of potassium-doped Ni (110)–O.” Surface science 440(3): L868-L874. Read it online here.
- Biesinger, M. C., et al. (2009). “X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopic chemical state quantification of mixed nickel metal, oxide and hydroxide systems.” Surface and Interface Analysis: An International Journal devoted to the development and application of techniques for the analysis of surfaces, interfaces and thin films 41(4): 324-332. Read it online here.
- Biesinger, M. C., et al. (2011). “Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni.” Applied Surface Science 257(7): 2717-2730. Read it online here.
- Fu, Z., et al. (2018). “Quantitative analysis of Ni2+/Ni3+ in Li [NixMnyCoz] O2 cathode materials: Non-linear least-squares fitting of XPS spectra.” Applied Surface Science 441: 1048-1056. Read it online here.
About this Site
Welcome to HarwellXPS Guru – a doorway to XPS enlightenment. So what is this site? X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), is a powerful tool for the study [...]
Actinium
ActiniumDoublet Separations Doublet Separations Available Photoemissions and Energies The Energies Listed are Binding Energies! Ac 4p: 890 eV Ac 4d: 639 eV Ac 4f: [...]
Advanced Auger Analysis
Learn about the additional information made possible from analysis of Auger-Meitner electrons!
Avantage Resource Centre
CasaXPS Resource Centre Avantage is an incredibly powerful tool for XPS analysis, developed and provided by Thermo Fisher Scientific. You can find Avantage here. General Use [...]
Calcium
CalciumDoublet Separations Doublet Separations Ca 2p: 3.5 eV Ca 3p: 0.4 eV Available Photoemissions and Energies The Energies Listed are Binding Energies! Ca 2s: 438 [...]
CasaXPS Resource Centre
CasaXPS Resource Centre CasaXPS is possibly the most widely used software for fitting XPS data, developed by Neal Fairley. You can find bountiful resources for CasaXPS [...]
Cesium
CesiumDoublet Separations Doublet Separations Cs 3d: 14 eV Cs 3p: 68 eV Cs 4d: 2.3 eV Cs 4p: 11.1 eV Cs 5p: 1.9 eV Available Photoemissions [...]
Chromium
ChromiumDoublet Separations Doublet Separations Cr 2p: 9.3 eV Available Photoemissions and Energies The Energies Listed are Binding Energies! Cr 2s: 695 eV Cr 2p: 575 [...]
Coster-Kronig Transmissions in XPS
Coster-Kronig transitions cause unequal broadening in spin-orbit doublets
Data Analysis 1 – Getting Started With CasaXPS
XPS for BeginnersData Analysis 1XPS Course FundamentalsXPS Data AnalysisData Analysis 1 - Getting Started With CasaXPSData Analysis 2 - Data CalibrationData Analysis 3 - Regions and [...]
Data Analysis 2 – Data Calibration
XPS for BeginnersData Analysis 2XPS Course FundamentalsXPS Data AnalysisData Analysis 1 - Getting Started With CasaXPSData Analysis 2 - Data CalibrationData Analysis 3 - Regions and [...]
Data Analysis 3 – Regions and Backgrounds
XPS for BeginnersData Analysis 3XPS Course FundamentalsXPS Data AnalysisData Analysis 1 - Getting Started With CasaXPSData Analysis 2 - Data CalibrationData Analysis 3 - Regions and [...]
Data Analysis 4 – Fitting Peak Components
XPS for BeginnersData Analysis 4XPS Course FundamentalsXPS Data AnalysisData Analysis 1 - Getting Started With CasaXPSData Analysis 2 - Data CalibrationData Analysis 3 - Regions and [...]
Data Analysis 5 – Doublets in XPS
XPS for BeginnersData Analysis 5XPS Course FundamentalsXPS Data AnalysisData Analysis 1 - Getting Started With CasaXPSData Analysis 2 - Data CalibrationData Analysis 3 - Regions and [...]
Data Analysis 6 – Asymmetry and Line shapes
XPS for BeginnersData Analysis 6XPS Course FundamentalsXPS Data AnalysisData Analysis 1 - Getting Started With CasaXPSData Analysis 2 - Data CalibrationData Analysis 3 - Regions and [...]
Data Analysis 7 – Quantification
XPS for BeginnersData Analysis 7XPS Course FundamentalsXPS Data AnalysisData Analysis 1 - Getting Started With CasaXPSData Analysis 2 - Data CalibrationData Analysis 3 - Regions and [...]
Data Analysis 8 – Exporting and Presenting
XPS for BeginnersData Analysis 8XPS Course FundamentalsXPS Data AnalysisData Analysis 1 - Getting Started With CasaXPSData Analysis 2 - Data CalibrationData Analysis 3 - Regions and [...]
Data Analysis for Beginners
Welcome to the HarwellXPS course – Data Analysis for beginners. Here we will be running through everything you need to get you started on your journey [...]
Dysprosium
DysprosiumDoublet Separations Doublet Separations Dy 3d: 40 eV Dy 4s: 6.4 eV Dy 5s: 2.7 eV Available Photoemissions and Energies The Energies Listed are Binding Energies! [...]
Gadolinium
GadoliniumDoublet Separations Doublet Separations Gd 3d: 31 eV Gd 4d: 6.7 eV Gd 5p: 0.6 eV Available Photoemissions and Energies The Energies Listed are Binding [...]
Getting Started & What is next
Phosfluorescently engage worldwide methodologies with web-enabled technology.
Initial vs Final State Effects
What is the differences between initial, and final state effects?
Krypton
KryptonDoublet Separations Doublet Separations Kr 3p: 8 eV Kr 3d: 1.23 eV Available Photoemissions and Energies The Energies Listed are Binding Energies! Sb 3d: 528 [...]
Manganese
ManganeseDoublet Separations Doublet Separations Mn 2p: 11.2 eV (metal) Mn 2p: 11.7 eV (oxides) Mn 3s: Variable - see experimental section below Available Photoemissions and Energies [...]
Multiplet splitting of s-orbitals in first row transition metals
Rare multiplet splitting of S-orbitals may yield additional insights into chemical environments
Niobium
NiobiumDoublet Separations Doublet Separations Nb 3d: 2.78 eV Nb 3p: 15.5 eV Nb 4p: 1.8 eV Available Photoemissions and Energies The Energies Listed are Binding Energies! [...]
Nitrogen
NitrogenDoublet Separations Doublet Separations No non S-orbital emissions Available Photoemissions and Energies The Energies Listed are Binding Energies! N 1s: 399 eV Common Element Overlaps [...]
Pass Energy
What is ‘Pass Energy’ in XPS? What does it come from? What do I need to know when collecting, or analysing, data?
Potassium
PotassiumDoublet Separations Doublet Separations K 2p: 2.8 eV Available Photoemissions and Energies The Energies Listed are Binding Energies! The Energies Listed are Binding Energies! [...]
Samarium
SamariumDoublet Separations Doublet Separations Sm 3d: 23.2 eV Sm 4p: 18.2 eV Sm 5s: 2.8 eV Available Photoemissions and Energies The Energies Listed are Binding Energies! [...]
Software
XPS Analysis Software The following links are to software required for XPS data analysis, modelling and simulation. CasaXPS – The software we use at HarwellXPS. Note [...]
Tantalum
TantalumDoublet Separations Doublet Separations Ta 4f: 1.92 eV Ta 4d: 11.5 eV Ta 4p: 62.5 eV Available Photoemissions and Energies The Energies Listed are Binding Energies! [...]
Tungsten
TungstenDoublet Separations Doublet Separations W 4d: 12.5 eV W 4f: 2.2. eV W 4p: 67.1 eV Available Photoemissions and Energies The Energies Listed are Binding Energies! [...]
Uranium
UraniumDoublet Separations Doublet Separations U 4d: 42.3 eV U 4f: 10.9 eV U 5d: 8.2 eV U 5p: 63.6 eV U 6p: 10 eV Available Photoemissions [...]
Xenon
XenonDoublet Separations Doublet Separations Xe 3d: 12.6 eV Available Photoemissions and Energies The Energies Listed are Binding Energies! Xe 3s: 1148 eV Xe 3p: 940 [...]
XPS Transmission Function
Detector Transmission Function is important in quantifying our data
Ytterbium
YtterbiumDoublet Separations Doublet Separations Yb 4d: 9 eV Yb 4p: 49 - 51.9 eV Yb 5p: 6 eV Available Photoemissions and Energies The Energies Listed are [...]
Yttrium
YttriumDoublet Separations Doublet Separations Y 3d: 2 eV Y 3p: 11.9 eV Available Photoemissions and Energies The Energies Listed are Binding Energies! Y 3s: 395 [...]
